-----If the Institution of Marriage has absolutely nothing to do with human physical relations, then how can a man and a woman be legally acknowledged physically mating with each other with the Institution of Marriage? Same sex marriage advocates claim that the Institution of Marriage has absolutely nothing to do with human physical relations. They must make this claim in order to have any case for same sex marriage because if the Institution of Marriage does have anything to do with human physical relations it is most assuredly a man and a woman physically mating with each other. For example, a man and a woman physically mating with each other are infinitely superior to the Institution of Marriage. They always have been and they always will be! A man and a woman physically mating with each other is how the human species perpetuates homosexuals! Same sex marriage advocates also claim that the Institution of Marriage has absolutely nothing to do with same gender physical relations, that is to say "homosexual relations". However, there are two different views of human physical relations that exist in physical reality. Each is valid in and of itself. The first view is that when a human being physically touches another human being then human physical relations exist in physical reality. When they stop physically touching each other then human physical relations no longer exist in physical reality. This view is valid in and of itself. The other view is that all human relations are inherently physically mating less. This view is also valid in and of itself.----When a man and a woman don't physically touch other, stand two feet apart from each other and say "hi" to each other, that is an example of physically mating less human relations in physical reality. They never physically touched each other so of course their relationship is physically mating less and their relationship exists in physical reality because they exist in physical reality and by comparison to them physically mating with each other in physical reality. When a man and a woman shake hands with each other that is also an example of physically mating less human relations in physical reality. Whether there is any physical contact or not the relationship between a man and a woman is always physically mating less human relations in physical reality unless and untill they physically mate with each other.----When a man and a woman are physically mating with each other that is not an example of physically mating less human relations in physical reality. Therefore there are two types of human physical relations that exist in physical reality, mating and mating less, and this is physical reality that human beings can do absolutely nothing about. Please note that this dichotomy of human physical relations does not apply to same gender relations. Two members of the same gender shaking hands is not an example of "physically homosexual less" human relations in physical reality. It is an example of physically mating less human relations in physical reality. That there is no analogous dichotomy of same gender physical relations in physical reality is physical reality human beings can do absolutely nothing about, not religious dogma.----Separation of Church and State properly applied would mean that the State has its Institution of Marriage with public civil law, the Church would have its Institution of Marriage with religious law, and they can have absolutely nothing to do with each other. The State could not legally acknowledge the Church Institution of Marriage in any way shape or form or have anything to do with the Church Institution of Marriage in any way shape or form. The Church could not legally acknowledge the State Institution of Marriage in any way shape or form or have anything to do with the State Institution of Marriage in any way shape or form. However, nobody wants Separation of Church and State to be properly applied! Why does the State legally acknowledge the Church Institution of Marriage when it should not be doing so? 1. Because the State and Church have always agreed that the Institution of Marriage legally acknowlegdes a man and a woman physically mating with each other. 2. Tradition! It's an old dead white guy tradition that desperately needs to be as dead as they are.----So then how are same sex marriage advocates misapplying Separation of Church and State to the Institution of Marriage? When a man and a woman walk into a church to get married they are considered by that church to be physically mating less with each other. After the marriage ceremony that church considers them to be legally acknowledged by that church's religious law as physically mating with each other, i.e., husband and wife. Since the State legally acknowledges this marriage with public civil law, same sex marriage advocates claim that, due to separation of Church and State, the State must legally acknowledge them with public civil law as being physically mating less with each other, because the Church legally acknowledges them as physically mating with each other with that church's religious law. So called "Separation of Church and State". Please note that with same sex marriage the State will no longer legally acknowledge a man and a woman legally married to each other as being husband and wife, that is to say as physically mating with each other. The State will legally acknowledge them as being "participant A" and "participant B", that is to say as being physically mating less with each other. This is the so called "equality" of same sex marriage because all same gender relations are and can only be physically mating less.----There is no such thing as equality as far as the Institution of Marriage is concerned. In fact that's the point of the Institution of Marriage, to differentiate opposite gender physical relations and put those differentiated opposite gender physical relations on a pedestal with special legal status, rights, benefits, and privileges. That's what the Institution of Marriage is, that's what the Institution of Marriage does. It legally acknowledges that opposite gender physical relations are unequal in physical reality. Which is why same gender relations have absolutely nothing to do with the Institution of Marriage. However same sex marriage will flip this dichotomy around by legally differentiating same gender physical relations instead of opposite gender physical relations. That is to say with same sex marriage a man and a woman will be legally acknowledged as being homosexual physical relations (i.e., homosexual "union") because a man and a woman can be legally acknowledged as being physically mating less. With same sex marriage two human beings shaking hands will be "physically homosexual less" human relations instead of being physically mating less human relations. There is only one Institution of Marriage! The only question is which human physical relations is this one and only Institution of Marriage going to differentiate and there are only two options, opposite gender (physically mating from physically mating less), or same gender,(homosexual from homosexual less, even though the are both physically mating less, i.e., exactly the same thing). Which is why with same sex marriage a man and a woman physically mating with each other has absolutely nothing to with the Redefined Institution of Marriage because in same sex marriage theory all human relations are inherently "homosexual less" not inherently mating less. It would be nice if there were a marital paradigm that could include  both a man and a woman physically mating with each other and physically mating less human relations. However, do to the nature of the beast that is not possible.----Human beings can legally acknowledge the existence of human physical relations with public criminal law, (rape, incest, prostitution), with public civil law, (Institution of Marriage), and with religious law, (Institution of Marriage, adultry). To say that it is absolutely impossible to legally acknowledge the existence of human physical relations with public civil law or with religious law is of course a big fat P.C. mindf**k lie! Perhaps heterosexuals should exercise their inherent authority by creating an Institution of Mating to legally acknowledge the existence of human physical relations with public civil law so a man and a woman can be legally acknowledged physically mating with each other, other than being a criminal offense! The human species does not revolve around homosexual relations in physical reality. The human species does revolve around a man and a woman physically mating with each other in physical reality. If that is not "Politically Correct" well that's just to damned bad. I would like to think that there is a very special place reserved in hell for "Political Correctness" and same sex "marriage" and it is right next to Adolph Hitler!