To the Editor: Perhaps heterosexuals should exercise their inherent authority by creating an Institution of Mating. Same sex marriage advocates claim the Institution of Marriage is a human construction, therefore human beings can construct more than one Institution of Union. Human beings can legally acknowledge the existence of physical mating as being rape, as being incest, as being prostitution, as being a sexual offense. Same sex marriage advocates claim the Institution of Marriage has absolutely nothing to do with human physical relations, absolutely nothing to do with human beings legally acknowledging the existence of human physical relations.Therefore, it is absolutely impossible for a man and a woman to be legally acknowledged as physically mating with the Institution of Marriage. With the Institution of Marriage a man and a woman can only be legally acknowledged as physically mating less. Perhaps heterosexuals should exercise their inherent authority by creating an Institution of Mating to legally acknowledge the existence of physical mating other than being a sexual offence, so a man and a woman can be legally acknowledged as physically mating other than being a sexual offence. If heterosexuals cannot legally acknowledge a man and a woman as physically mating other than being a sexual offence by what physical mating is, i.e.,  THE physical union of a man and a woman--then heterosexuals will legally acknowledge a man and a woman as physically mating other than being a sexual offence by what physical mating is not, e.g., first and foremost physical mating is not same gender relations. Heterosexuals must exercise their inherent authority by creating a more perfect Institution of Union. Sincerely, I prefer the term witch hunter.You may address me as Mr. Witch Hunter. P.S. Oh ye of little faith.