Marriage legally predicates the perpetuation of the human species on mating, heterosexual relations. Legally all marriages are mating, heterosexual relations. As far as the law is concerned the perpetuation of the human species must conform to the dictates of mating, heterosexual relations. And it spreads out from there. Socially, culturally, societally, civilizationally, the human species revolves around mating, heterosexual relations. Same sex marriage will legally predicate the perpetuation of the human species on matingless homosexual relations, specifically two males performing anal sodomy. Legally all marriages will be matingless homosexual relations, specifically two males performing anal sodomy. As far as the law is concerned the perpetuation of the human species will have to conform to the dictates of matingless homosexual relations, specifically two males performing anal sodomy. And it will spread out from there. Socially, culturally, societally, civilizationally, the human species will have to revolve around matingless homosexual relations, specifically two males performing anal sodomy. Worked out to the limit of it's logic eventually homosexuals will be able to legally control whether heterosexuals can get married or not, have children or not, or even have mating heterosexual relations or not. Just like heterosexuals have always been able to legally control whether homosexuals can get married or not, have children or not, or even have matingless homosexual relations or not. So, am I to conclude equality like beauty is in the eye of the beholder? And if same sex marriage advocates are wrong then what are the consequences and why should those consequences be reevaluated?